|
|
|
|
|
|
by nirse
1017 days ago
|
|
|
Why would that be misleading? This seems to be just an attempt to better understand (some of the / potential) causes that unknown condition. Perhaps it doesn't help to diagnose it, as there might not be any direct evidence left in the body to point at the original cause, but in the longer term it certainly helps if you know where to look. |
|
|
It's just that if CFS doesn't point to something real, then that non-real, non-specific thing, having an origin doesn't really make sense.
But if it is actually real (and specific), as indicated by another commenter, the origin seems fine. Still seems like there's mixed views in medical community though.