Is this not just an obvious scientific fact on the verge common sense? Why would anyone (who's not a religious nut or something) not think exactly that?
Because if you’re not paying really, really good attention to what’s going on, it doesn’t really feel like that’s what’s happening. At least for most people!
They would describe, “anger makes my skin hot” not “my skin getting hot makes me experience anger.”
That's a good answer, but it doesn't take much questioning for it to break down. What is this "anger" other than its collection of symptoms? If you strip away all of its properties and effects, then what's left for it to be? It becomes rather ghostly then.
Well that’s exactly James’ point. We’re both sitting 150 years downstream of his major philosophical breakthroughs so it’s a bit hard to ask “what’s all the fuss.”
They would describe, “anger makes my skin hot” not “my skin getting hot makes me experience anger.”