|
|
|
|
|
|
by harpooniker
1018 days ago
|
|
|
"would it not make more sense to just replace the fossil fuel with renewable energy" What if people don't want to switch? They'll just elect someone who stops the progress. The carbon capture doesn't require the cooperation of the public, except for funding. |
|
|
but then
> doesn't require the cooperation of the public, except for funding
carbon capture require just as much cooperation. Just of a different form. There's no way around it, since the work to do capture does not directly produce a private benefit. You'd have to regulate it to make it work, for example, force a penalty for emitters that cost more than the capture.
This means you will already need to elect someone to propose and pass the legislation. In which case, those who would end up having to pay will simply elect the opposition.