[iancmceachern]

I love the armatron. It was so many engineers first exposure to robotic systems, was affordable and get-able by regular people, and magically ran off on one single motor. I was just watching some YouTube videos on it and how well designed the mechanics of it are, so clever!

[mohn]

I was researching the Armatron last weekend and was surprised to learn then about the single-motor operation. It's quite a complex system of linkages and transmissions [0] to enable the six degrees of freedom. I suppose that explains why the toy is so noisy. I had no idea that was how it worked, must not have taken mine apart when it broke or I outgrew it or whatever happened.

[0] http://www.jeff-z.com/pinball/toys/armatron/armatron.html

[iancmceachern]

Totally.

It also highlights an interesting change in engineering and product development that has happoned in my lifetime.

It used to be, when this Armatron was made, electronics and computers were magic and mechanical engineering, real complicated kind of mechanical stuff, was common and the slillset to do it was similarly common. In that world it makes sense to have the whole robot arm powered by one motor that constantly spins, with mechanical clutches and linkages deciding what moves when. That's because electronics and mechatronics like motors and encoders were still expensive and new.

Now its the opposite. In general, if given the choice between a complicated mechanical solution and a "simple" electronic/computer solution we choose that. Simple is in quoted because modern electronics and computers are far from simple. The manufacturing of a modern semiconductor rivals the Manhattan project. But is seems simple because we can just buy it at best buy and program it to do things. You can easily find lots of engineers to do something with code or an arduino, but finding someone who can design a fly ball governer, or even know what that is and why it matters, is rare.

Now days there are tons of cheap robot arms that have a servo motor for each joint, because servos are cheap and complex mechanics are not.

[imtringued]

>Now days there are tons of cheap robot arms that have a servo motor for each joint, because servos are cheap and complex mechanics are not.

Servo motors aren't cheap at all. Encoders aren't cheap either, in what universe do you live? The RC toys don't count by the way, because the cheap RC servos are terrible.

A fly ball governer? Is this some kind of joke? How are you going to operate it in any orientation other than upright? Why would you even want to?

There are probably ways to build a control loop with discrete electronics components that is cheaper than a mechanical system like that. Heck, it is probably cheaper to build an entire CPU with discrete components and then program that.

The reason nobody knows this crap is because it is useless. Your pseudo nostalgia for an age that existed before your time is ridiculous.