[jiofj]

Of course.

I've seen this argument so many times. I like something, so we have to make a law to force it to exist. Or, I don't like something, so we have to make a law to make it illegal.

Unless there is a monopoly, and social networks certainly aren't one, there's no reason to force them to do anything.

[Pyramus]

> there's no reason to force them to do anything.

So why are we forcing social networks to do a lot of things already today: We force them to remove illegal content, remove content that is not suited for minors, moderate content that is traumatic, protect people's privacy etc?

I don't really understand? Is your point that we should not be doing this as well? Is your fear that the state of California will moderate Twitter?

[jiofj]

This is starting to sound like concern trolling to me.

[keonix]

For what it's worth, I think OP has a point in showing inconsistencies in your logic