[arethuza]

"definitely not necessary"

If you live in any kind of rural area bus services are likely to be pretty poor and if you aren't next to a railway station then what do you do? Cars are as important in rural areas in the UK as much as any other country.

Edit: Of course, the proportion of people in this position in the UK is probably relatively low but they do exist - I'm one!

[ghaff]

I find a lot of people adapt their lifestyles to their transportation options and vice versa. I know of people who live in Boston without cars and they're mostly just not inclined to leave the city as much unless they're doing activities with friends who have vehicles. On the other hand, all the people I know who do a lot of activities outside the city own cars--and even tend to move out of the city over time.

[arethuza]

I used to live in central Edinburgh and I walked to work, my wife walked to work and our son walked to school. We did own a car but used it rarely.

Now we live in a rural area (which was our choice) and we now have two cars and pretty much have to use them to get anywhere - although I do drive to the train station to get the train into Edinburgh.

[laurencerowe]

Bus coverage in rural areas of the UK is variable but it’s on a completely different level to the US where I now live.

The high school I went to growing up had people travel in from all over the county by public transport (train and bus). I certainly wouldn’t choose to live in a rural area without a car but people did!

[arethuza]

"More than a quarter of routes in county and rural areas of the country have been lost in the past decade, with passenger numbers falling sharply."

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2023/jul/19/rural-bus-se...

NB I'm in Scotland but I doubt if its much better here.