[mathisfun123]

I gave you two examples of past poor performance and you either blithely ignored them or dismissed them as unimportant because it's "totally outside what you do". Then at the end you admitted you don't pay attention to the details. So we're either back to why are debating things you don't understand or why are you fawning.

The thing that always gets me in these pissing contests is some random decides to wade in based purely on ____ and then when I point out ____ I'm the asshole. Like isn't it clear you just shouldn't have started making claims? Why am I in the wrong for knowing/understanding and demonstrating that understanding but you're not in the wrong for just guessing?

[qaq]

Could you give me an example of a "claim" I made ?

[sillyfluke]

To be fair mathisfun123 was originally responding to someone who tried it out and was somewhat disappointed by the state of things given the hype. It's a valid point.

Responding with only "have you looked at the team?" with nothing to say about the current state of things, which was what the sidethread was about, is what probably set them off since it is actually a pretty patronizing thing to say.

You want to give more leeway to the team because you think they earned the cred. mathisfun123, not impressed by the details of certain past projects, is not going to hold their breath until the current state justifies the current hype.

Both are reasonable positions.

[qaq]

I had 0 intention of it to sound patronizing as you prob noticed english is not my native lang.

[mathisfun123]

how many more tedious questions are you going to ask?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sealioning

[qaq]

this is literally 2nd question I have asked 1) Have you looked at the team 2) Based on your postulate that I should not be making claims wanted to see an example of claim I should not make. As I don't think I actually made any claims. I am not sure why this is tedious 1) is pretty much yes or no 2) is just copy paste of a "claim"