[FirmwareBurner]

Thanks for the explanation. That kind of sucks though. I was spoiled by how good hibernate works on Windows and assumed any modern desktop OS should come with this feature if it wishes to "cut the king". I guess it's another nail in the "switching to Linux" coffin.

[orbisvicis]

There's also the issue of hibernating a 32Gb image to a 512Gb ssd several times a day. That can't be good for longevity.

[FirmwareBurner]

>hibernating a 32Gb image to a 512Gb ssd several times a day

1) It's 16GB image to 1TB SSD for me, but who needs to hibernate several times a day? I only use it when I take my laptop out of the house on long journeys which is a couple of times a month at most.

2) It's my SSD, I paid for it, and I should be allowed to use it how I please, even like in your example of hibernating it several times a day if I wish. Why should the OS dev stop me from doing this? It's my HW, not theirs.

I would understand this angle if he OS developer(Canonical) was also responsible for the longevity and the warranty of the HW I bought from them, the way Apple and sometimes Microsoft is, but since for Canonical this is not the case since they don't sell laptops, why should they limit me like that? You can show a disclaimer telling the user that hibernate will degrade the SSD if that's a big legal issue for them.

Heck, even Microsoft let's you enable hibernate with just 3 clicks.