Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by jkachmar 1017 days ago
extremely disappointing that y’all needed the venue to impose this decision.

as said by a friend this morning:

> i, personally, would not accept money from the company actively militarizing the southern US border but that's just me
1 comments
mlindner 1016 days ago
> as said by a friend this morning:

> > i, personally, would not accept money from the company actively militarizing the southern US border but that's just me

Anduril is not "militarizing" the southern border. They're adding observation stations (funded by the Biden administration mind you) so that who is crossing the border illegally is known. There's no weapons on these things or something.

link
joepie91_ 1015 days ago
No, the weapons come later. The "observation stations" just determine who they will be pointed at. That's different, right?
link
mlindner 1015 days ago
There is no contract to provide weapons on the border nor has any official stated they are interested in doing so. It's just pointless hyperbole.
link
pxc 1014 days ago
People die crossing the border trying to avoid those cameras, because it forces them through the most dangerous parts of the desert.

The same tech is deeply wrapped up in the Israeli occupation of Palestine.

It's absolutely absurd to pretend that the whole business of border enforcement tech is not stained with blood.

If you're interested in the relevant US history and why it's characterized as militarization and violence by those opposed to it, I recommend this book: https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/7861.No_One_Is_Illegal

(The book has a point of view and makes no apologies for that. But if you want to see why people who disagree with you see the US border and its enforcement the way they do, it will provide that for you.)

link