|
|
|
|
|
by gabereiser
1022 days ago
|
|
I welcome programming English++ with open arms so long as I can scold it when it makes mistakes and it doesn’t require move semantics. I’m joking of course but I do think LLM’s will become part of the programming language lexer of some kind. If not already being looked into. |
|
I think once we get past "make the LLM generate #$%!#@ JSON" we will start seeing a lot more of this, since we will then be able to constrain the code-paths that are followed.
I could absolutely see LLM-powered operators being introduced at some point, that we use just like an if statement.
Imagine "if(input like LLM(greeting))" or while(LLM(input) like "interested")
essentially distilling unstructured inputs into a canonical form to be used in control flows:
Switch(LLM(input)): - case request - case question - case query