Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by isykt 1022 days ago
The classical market is primarily older, wealthier, and willing to pay for quality physical media.
1 comments

> willing to pay for quality physical media.

How does that square with Apple wanting to put the music from this label in an app? Upsells to collectible media?

Convert last remaining streaming hold outs - Apple has high quality audio as standard, vs Spotify who still haven't implemented it even as a premium feature. The other high quality audio streaming platforms are probably too far away from the classical demographic (though, maybe Qobuz could) so it's a market where they can - potentially - own the market.

If you can get those folk to see the value of Apple Music, and they have an Apple TV (I bet there's a strong crossover here) and get them onto Apple One family plan, then you get kids/other family members using Apple Music.

So taking classical makes a lot of sense.

But yes, there's potentially also a physical side to it. I'm assuming that if Apple starts acquiring classical labels they will pretty much let them continue to operate as a record label - but with the luxury of perhaps not having to worry quite so much about top line economics.

Not a classical label, but another "premium" label I'm friendly with did a limited edition boxset of a particular artist and sold 1000 copies at about $400 - $500 a shot in under 12 hours. So doing premium releases is big money - but also very costly to manufacture, and when people are paying that sort of money they expect a REALLY great unboxing experience. Which, I guess, kind of aligns with what Apple does elsewhere.

Apple makes high quality speakers and headphones, that’s the cross sell.