|
|
|
|
|
by SnowProblem
1013 days ago
|
|
The issue isn't the possible noise in non-covid deaths. It's this rather bold statement: "None of these deaths were considered related to BNT162b2 by investigators" How would they know? What investigators and what criteria? If there was a 20% increase in seemingly-unrelated deaths, would it be detected? These are the questions that Pfizer should have explained but instead we just got this one pithy sentence. Also remember, this is industry with a history of fraud and criminality. GSK was fined billions for covering up heart deaths in a diabetes treatment only a few years earlier and Pfizer is up on the list too. Our FDA needed to be our advocates and a lot of people feel let down seeing this rubber-stamped. |
|