|
|
|
|
|
by saetaes
1010 days ago
|
|
> You seem to be overlooking the bald-faced lie told by Meta/IG that someone's new account is violating "Community Guidelines" before they can even use it. I don't know about OP, but the the article they linked had a screenshot showing that the Community Guidelines they'd violated were around "account integrity". Looking at those[1], it seems plausible that OP and the article's author used something during account creation that triggered an integrity system, similar to what the parent was describing. Maybe they used a proxy/VPN, or something else that caused the robots to think that they were "Creat(ing) an account by scripted or other inauthentic means." I don't think that big tech deserves a free pass on much, but to think they they're suspending accounts just to harvest phone numbers seems like it would be something they'd likely get into deep shit over: stock price drop, huge fines, CEO in front of Congress-type of thing. I doubt it would be worth it to them. 1. https://transparency.fb.com/policies/community-standards/acc... |
|
Compare my HN username to the domain name of the linked article. I am the author.
I did not use a proxy or VPN.
> to think they they're suspending accounts just to harvest phone numbers seems like it would be something they'd likely get into deep shit over: stock price drop, huge fines, CEO in front of Congress-type of thing. I doubt it would be worth it to them.
Apparently it was worth it to them:
https://techcrunch.com/2019/10/08/twitter-admits-it-used-two...
This is not a conspiracy theory, it's something that has actually happened.