| It failed my simple "fox, goose, corn" benchmark. Here's the prompt: "Farmer to cross a river with fox, goose and corn in a boat that takes at most two. Fox eats goose and goose eats corn if left alone.
Farmer can row the boat himself and doesn't need a boatman to ferry them across.
How can he cross the river with all the three unharmed in least number of trips?" It starts promising but fails in step 5: Let's think through the problem step by step: 1. The farmer needs to transport three items across the river: a fox, a goose, and some corn. 2. He can only take one item with him on each trip because if he leaves the fox and the goose together, the fox will eat the goose, and if he leaves the goose and the corn together, the goose will eat the corn. 3. Therefore, the first trip should be with the goose since it is harmless and won't cause any damage to the other items. 4. After dropping off the goose at the other side of the river, the farmer returns to pick up the fox for the second trip. 5. Once the fox is dropped off at the other side, the farmer returns again to pick up the corn for the third and final trip. 6. Upon reaching the other side, the farmer reunites with his unharmed fox, goose, and corn. Final answer: It takes 3 trips to cross the river with all three unharmed. |
What if it was trained in simplified Chinese and the training/parameters were not sufficient to have it correctly map out that logic to English, so it fails it, yet it can do it correctly in Chinese?