| This is the enshittification of open source. It has been happening for a while with a bunch of startups like Supabase claiming to be "open source" and marketing themselves as such but making it really hard to self host for a long time. It wasn't just them either. I would see with disgust a bunch of startups use "open source" as their marketing tactic, no matter how hard it was to setup or run without their hosted service. It is also a peverse incentive: the harder the open source system is to run and maintain, the more you will gravitate toward their cloud. Supposedly open source companies raising a ton of money from VC is also strangely contrary to the open source ethos. Deno KV is basically the next jump in that chain. Richard Stallman was right once again, as usual. |
You can simply not use it, no?
I am not going to make any sweeping generalizations across all products. But at least in the case of Deno KV, there doesn't seem to be lock-in. So if you were running something self-hosted for KV persistence, it will continue to work unmodified.
> I would see with disgust a bunch of startups use "open source" as their marketing tactic.
Again, not sure which bunch of startups. But I am not seeing that with this product. Seems more like a survival strategy to add some cashflow behind the developers.
I am curious what you think Open Source should be (or should not be). I think it's fair that running a service in the cloud should cost something. And self-hosting it, I think it's fair that it requires a bit more effort than using the hosted service.