[happytoexplain]

I disagree. When I have a question, I am prepared for the answer to have some amount of ambiguity, especially when it comes to historical questions of the format "why is X", "how did X originate", etc. If I were trying to choose a descriptive name for an article, the question that it researches is a reasonable choice. Combined then, I am happy with the article's content given its title, and I am happy with the information it delivered to me without my having to do my own research. I don't feel that this is clickbait, nor do I feel qualified to assert that their conclusion is wrong.

[ghaff]

Yes, and like many I've heard the anti-jamming explanation (contra the slow typists down one), so I actually find it interesting that this is a somewhat unsettled question.