|
|
|
|
|
by parentheses
1020 days ago
|
|
30 years of expected support is pretty unreasonable. Stating a requirement like this makes the discussion about competing dogmas. Rather, it's about the right way to
keep devices operational as long as possible while also allowing companies to remain possible. 30 years of support expectations immediately makes the cost of any device go up to hedge against the risk of fines during the entire 30 years. It also makes it harder to disrupt an industry with hardware at its core. I don't have a single computing device that has lasted longer than 10 years. Reasonably speaking, either performance or features start to make the device largely obsolete and unusable. I think a better way to propose this would be the expectation that when a product is EOL, it should be supportable by the buyer for a certain period. This requires figuring out the right period of support. I'd propose something that scales period based on cost or device class. A $1200 phone should be usable for 10 years while a $10 disposable glucose sensor with a battery should not. |
|