Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by galaxytachyon 1014 days ago
I remember there is a study about the alignment cost. Basically the more restrictions and limit you put on a model, the worse its general performance becomes. Things like a ban on violence, race, or any other sensitive topics effectively throttle or change how the model "reason" or connect information within its network of parameters and result in degraded capacity.

I wonder if this is the reason behind all of this.

Edit: the study: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2308.13449.pdf

3 comments

How much of it is OpenAI/Microsoft curtailing the compute being used to generate responses?
The accuracy loss is more consistent with some kind of quantization of the model(-s) behind the scenes than the alignment gone wrong. Quantization to serve more users faster, on same amount or less of compute.
Sorry, what does quantization mean here?
Reducing the precision of the weights from high precision floating points to either lower precision floats or even integers. You'd think it would greatly reduce the performance of a model, but in most cases the decline in quality is extremely tolerable compared to the reduction in memory/processing requirements.
It means using less number of bits to store float values. This reduces the memory/compute requirement at the cost of making model less precise.
Reducing the precision of the parameters — result being less memory intensive
How can i locate this study?. I think you are misrepresenting something.

In the gpt4 paper they specifically address this, and find that "Averaged across all exams, the base model achieves a score of 73.7% while the RLHF model achieves a score of 74.0%, suggesting that post-training does not substantially alter base model capability."

The problem with these studies is that we really still don’t know. Nobody can replicate the papers of OpenAI.
Found it, it is a pretty recent paper.

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2308.13449.pdf

Given the homogeneity of responses on taboo subjects, there's probably something exogenous to the model at work.
It feels the same thing happens with humans.