|
|
|
|
|
|
by barrysteve
1019 days ago
|
|
|
You're not reading. You've fallen into the age old trap of reacting, to written text. His argument might well be farcical, suspend disbelief like you would watching some Micheal Bay nonsense. Do you let people get to the end of their sentence irl? I've noticed more that some people wont tolerate a building narrative in basic sentences, and want to deal only in conclusions. I really do miss the days when people regularly had multi-layered, long running conversations. Now everything has to be said in discrete steps, one by one. |
|
|
(To your very last sentence, I'd venture that kind of fees like the Socratic method :-)
But to the rest of the post, can you elaborate? Are you suggesting relaxing the skepticism / logic muscle and reaction for a while, and reading to see where it goes? I'd be willing to discuss that approach, though I'm also aware that's exactly what my cousin pishing deepak chopra keeps saying :-P.
In the finite time we have on this earth, how does one choose where and when to relax the filters, as opposed to saying "this is not bringing value, there are better materials to ingest?".
And the other context, which I feel we still haven't addressed is - lateral to whether there is any advanced and isolated value in reading Plato, do we really feel it's a good suggestion to get somebody introduced to concepts? I still feel there are way better ways to get somebody introduced to core ideas, and then advanced readers who want to zero-in, experience the original material and immerse themselves into context of the times (and the good / bad / ugly / archaic thay goes with it), can certainly choose to do so.
Thx again!