|
|
|
|
|
|
by xattt
1018 days ago
|
|
|
I agree with this. Emotional investment is entangled with a generational home. You don’t want an inherited home with positive memories to turn into a drug den, so you’re incentivized to screen out unfavorable tenants. If you’re a large-scale real estate corp, the houses are just income earners and as long as the income is greater than the n expenses, you don’t give a rats ass who lives there. |
|
|
Unless your implication is that it’s ok for some people to not have a place to live.