[nvm0n2]

They collect that data for a reason - if you only look back to 1850 then it's hard to know if you understand the cyclical aspects of the system.

Also bear in mind that data from ~1850 to 1950 is extremely sparse for most of the Earth's surface. Other than the USA very few places had widespread thermometer readings recorded during that era. For example the southern hemisphere outside of coastal Australia has almost no data. The error bars are also very wide, climatologists make big adjustments to the older data because they think the thermometers weren't being read correctly.

[ljf]

Are you serious about America being the centre of thermometer recording?

Did you forget about Europe, and the measurements that also took place in the empires of Europe?

Russia also has some pretty detailed records from across the span of what was their empire.

I'm not sure about Asia, but as I said the records from victorian period are pretty good in India and nearby countrys.

I'd been interested to learn more about your statement there, as it doesn't match with my own reading.

[nvm0n2]

Yes, completely serious. Here's the coverage map for the GHCN dataset for 1891-1920 (global historical climate network):

https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/sites/default/files/2021-03/statio...

Notice how the data comes almost entirely from the USA and Australia. In Australia it's only the populated coastal regions with data, with the central deserts having none. Density in Europe is virtually non-existent by comparison, with Spain/Portugal having no data, most of Russia having no data, large parts of Europe having only a single station, there's nothing in China, India, Japan, there's a single station for the whole of Africa, etc. And of course the sea is missing.

By 1950 things have improved in the northern hemisphere somewhat:

https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/sites/default/files/2021-03/statio...

Russia and Europe now has coverage throughout, albeit with way lower station density than the USA (probably it doesn't matter much). The southern hemisphere outside of Australia is still almost completely missing, just a handful of stations outside of South Africa.

Even today most parts of the Earth's surface are missing direct land measurements (there are satellites):

https://climatedataguide.ucar.edu/sites/default/files/2022-0...

None of this is surprising. Only rich stable parts of the world can afford to spend time reliably reading thermometers every day. Europe spent a lot of the time before 1950 either at war or rebuilding.

Note that missing data doesn't stop them colouring in those parts of the map with temperature readings and claiming they come from ground stations. They don't make it clear but for most of the world temperature readings are made up (interpolated over vast distances), example:

http://www.columbia.edu/~mhs119/Temperature/T_moreFigs/2015-...

They don't know what the mean was in 1950 for most of the world because they don't have any data, but that doesn't stop them drawing maps showing the change from that non-existent mean.