Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by kdkirsch 1022 days ago
When posting old pages/articles it may help if the OP explained why they are sharing on HN. Is there a particular question it answers? Is there some development that has made the article more or less useful/accurate? A comment would help guide additional comments.
8 comments

The reason why the submitter found it interesting doesn’t need to be the same as why the upvoters found it interesting.
I wholeheartedly agree, but I do appreciate it when submitters leave a top-level comment alongside the submission. There's no need for it to be special in any way, but it can help seed discussion IMO.
I see most internet forums as discussion groups where posts start out as invitations to conversation. However, I see HN more like a physical bulletin board in a workplace break room where people post whatever, whenever, and others passively view, interact with, or discuss it as they see fit.
Typically on HN people talk about whatever they want, no set agenda.
> When posting old pages/articles it may help if the OP explained why they are sharing on HN

I submitted this recently: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37341492

The site in question is: https://esif.dev/

I'm doing what @dang suggested:

> The audience here is sympathetic to this topic, of course—but lists don't make great HN submissions. It would be better to pick the most interesting / least known thing on the list and submit that instead.

I'm picking some URLs from that list, this is one of them.

Internet was a heaven in 2007.
Then HTML5 and Google/Chrome devs taking over the Internet happened.
I don't disagree with you but I did find the linked article very interesting to read absent any context.
I actually like this, also in cases where users sometimes post a submission that relates to some previous discussion, but does not require the context of said discussion but are interesting on their own
I actually like this, also in cases where users sometimes post a submission that relates to some previous discussion, but does not require the context of said discussion to be interesting.