[nanodeath]

I _think_ what they're saying is a specialized/curried function that takes a single argument is better than the method it's replacing that takes three strings or whatever. That is, `foo.a("a").b("b").c("c")` is better than `foo.a("a", "b", "c")`. Which...sure, but 1. if you're really passing 2-3 parameters in with identical types, maybe use inline value classes instead? Or at least type aliases?, and 2. if you can't or don't want to do that, named arguments help.

[mattsan]

Type safe builders/factories work and should be used where appropriate (e.g. to catch invalid state at compile time) but I don't see how this has anything to do with the currying shown in the post. The compiler checks the param types whether the function has a single param or not.