I believe the article is factually correct-ish, but is sensationalized and is spreading FUD and causing unnecessary potential panic.
That's why. I'm downplaying because it needs downplaying.
This wording is clear to me.
If this was in your original comment, I wouldn’t assume that you’re recommending to disregard safety measures.
Otherwise “ridiculous” or “:rolleyes:” are very ambiguous to me.
This wording is clear to me.
If this was in your original comment, I wouldn’t assume that you’re recommending to disregard safety measures.
Otherwise “ridiculous” or “:rolleyes:” are very ambiguous to me.