|
|
|
|
|
by turquoisevar
1017 days ago
|
|
It’s because they wanted their cake and eat it too, get as close as possible to the 4th amendment without crossing the line. Put simply, if they have knowledge of it they have a duty to report, but they can’t be compelled to try and find out. In theory this means that if they happen to stumble upon it or are being alerted to it by a third party (e.g. user report) then they have to report it, in practice many voluntarily monitor it, maybe because they want to avoid having to litigate that they didn’t have knowledge of it or maybe because it’s good PR or maybe because they care for the case. I think in most cases it’s all of the above in one degree or another. |
|
Words mean things, and we've gotten damned loose with it these days in my opinion when the want strikes. "Voluntary" anything with a $150000 fine for not doing it is no longer voluntary. It's now your job. If it's your job, and the State punishes you for not doing it, you are a deputy of the State. I do not care how many layers of legal fiction and indirection are between you and the State.
If you can't not comply without jeopardy, it ain't voluntary.