[huggyface]

There are two types of consumers.

There are two types of commentators-

-People who naively bisect a hugely complex, graduated marketplace

-People who understand it's far more involved than that.

Seriously, though, I think it's a bit perverse to see all of the proud boasting about the spend of iOS owners -- it often amounts to less than $100 per user, where $2.99 is considered an expensive app. Is this really the future that developers were hoping for? Dancing for pennies, hoping to be that incredibly rare break-out viral hit?

[beatle]

let me guess. you're a web developer threatened by the explosion of apps on mobile devices?

[huggyface]

Your original comment was the sort of partisan garbage that HN does not need (leave it to the Engadget comments), and I gave you the benefit of the doubt. Now, however, your stripes are a little too obvious.

[beatle]

pls. answer the question. it will give us perspective of where you're coming from (why you hate apps).

[huggyface]

Are you this boorish in real life?

I don't "hate apps" at all, and your claim to that effect makes you look a little juvenile, continuing your bizarre "bisect the world" fetish. Nonetheless in a discussion where you herald the spend of iOS buyers (the devices are "expensive"? They are some of the least expensive options in their respective realms), it is kind of humorous considering the actual reality that most iOS users in aggregate spend very little. Just tried to load up my new iPad and it was actually difficult to get much past $75...a few days ago I spent $600 on Vegas Pro for the PC.

[beatle]

I apologize.

Anyway, how about books/song/movie purchases?

[georgieporgie]

Downvoted for being rude and combative. The parent comment contained nothing that would lead anyone to such a strange reply as yours.

[beatle]

Agree. I apologize.