[MattHeard]

The licence is not for the user, the licence is for the publisher to do the bare minimum needed to tell their bosses that the model weights or implementation code was published ethically.

As others have pointed out, these licences appear unenforceable.

The publisher simply wants to appear responsible. There are likely many open-source-oriented engineers and scientists at these tech firms who have been pushing for publication. (See the discussion between Mark Zuckerberg and Lex Fridman.) The involved tech firms only care about the licence as far as it might minimise the likelihood of public backlash if any of these published models cause harm.