[sidfthec]

> I did not read the original paper, so maybe they accounted for this

Then why say it's an issue?

[RoyalHenOil]

I'm not saying it's an issue with the research. It's very likely the researchers thought of this.

It IS an issue with the article linked here, since it does not explain the research and causes readers to walk away believing there were only 1280 people.

[fooker]

They haven't.