|
|
|
|
|
|
by michaelni
5210 days ago
|
|
|
One issue with the OpenBSD "bug" that i think hasnt been mentioned is that while openbsds srandom(0) leading to a 0 sequence sucks.
The fix everyone is using (including up to date OpenBSD trunk)
causes srandom(X) and srandom(Y) to produce the same sequence for at least one pair of distinct X and Y. This probably is less an issue but still. For example linux debian with gnu libc produces the same sequence after srandom(0) and srandom(1). Namely
1804289383
846930886
1681692777
1714636915
... |
|
|