| If it really speaks to you, if you find it interesting in and of itself, go ahead. I don't believe it is the next big thing that will change the world though. I've revisited the "Web3" concept lately because I've gotten involved in the Fediverse and it seems to me that it is missing a universal system for authentication. To add new services to the Fedi it seems fundamental there should be single sign-on so I can log in and prove I am a certain person on mastodon.social. The traditional way to do this put the server in charge and I guess I would trust mastodon.social as much as I would trust Facebook or Google but there will always be people running small servers who are dishonest who might reset my password and steal my account. So the "Web3" concept where I have cryptographic keys and some immutable database that verifies those keys is appealing to me, but (1) it is so tied up with scams and I think the whole idea of "ownership" bothers people, it seems something like a timeshare scam or Amway or https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enclosure and (2) boy people hate managing their own cryptographic keys, I mean Che Guevara was one of the most disciplined revolutionaries in the world but he reused his one time pads so they tracked him down and put a bullet in him. I look at how people have really struggled with gpg, whenever I have published some open source project to maven or something I've always made up a new set of keys because I lost the keys I made three years ago when I published another project. Something like "Web3" that is low resource consumption, cheap to run, still secure and doesn't have all the bullshit, grifters, ugly apes, and all that might appeal to me but people will still hate managing keys |