Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by eh8 1021 days ago
This is especially true in UX design.

When I see a website...

- using a ridiculously thin or small font,

- relying on a high-end monitor to provide sufficient color contrast

- loading an unreasonable amount of resources only to provide laggy animations

...I'm wondering if the responsible designer(s) only have 32-in Retina displays and the latest Macbooks to work with. Because on any other combination of devices, the website looks and feels awful.

And I know this because I was formerly guilty of it!

2 comments

“ I'm wondering if the responsible designer(s) only have 32-in Retina displays and the latest Macbooks to work with. Because on any other combination of devices, the website looks and feels awful.”

I think often it’s that they aren’t users themselves. They make it “pretty” but not functional.

It's extremely rare that UX designers are also users of the products they develop. Maybe they use Figma or the order entry of Amazon even if they don't work for Figma or Amazon, but who of them is going to use again the order entry form for Random Customer N after they started working on the registration form of Random Customer N+1?
My GF is a designer and she always says that the problem is that nobody test anything. I've been helping with a project for her client and pretty much everything went on the fly.

I was able to spot obvious flaws in the design, she agreed but said that she had no time and such is life.

There are so many tools to see how a website looks like on multiple screens / devices. Even full on emulation. I can see a designer making this oversight but a UX designer doing that kinda makes the UX part of the title irrelevant.