[ceearrbee]

How is that a valid reason?

Standard compliance, especially in something like a website builder should be a top priority. If the builder doesn't work in major browsers, why there be any confidence that the sites it produces will?

[oleg009]

when you say confidence, is it because the person who builds, can't test in other browsers inside builder?

this is something we are going to solve soon by having ability to open up the build url and keeping it in sync with the changes.

[ceearrbee]

So, you are saying that there is no plan for it to work outside of Chrom(ium) browsers? It doesn't solve the problem of forcing someone to use a specific browser to use the platform.

It does not inspire confidence in an end product will work everywhere and be of high quality when the product to create it is buggy and limited.

[oleg009]

This would also solve the problem with testing on various mobile devices by e.g. using browserstack and similar tools or even physical phones.