|
|
|
|
|
|
by pastacacioepepe
1032 days ago
|
|
|
> No, the USSR was a big grown up country governed by people that understood the difference... So to rephrase it: never trust NATO's word. > The standard for notes is to provide relevant context. And I say it is relevant. NATO claims to be strictly a defensive alliance, the note adds contextual information to show that NATO is both expanding and waging wars of aggression. What can be more relevant than that? |
|
|
If “trust” to you means “invent application far beyond the context to which a commitment applies”, sure, otherwise, no, that’s not a rephrase.