[RNAlfons]

Do I have to build something comparable to be able to comment on the performance issues I have witnessed? I don't think so.

Do I have to accept all those excuses, which like those pictures of ships never run low in this company, to comment on the performance? I don't think so.

They promise a lot. They don't deliver. They break things which were already working and I'm still waiting. Those are clear signs of terrible Project Management and I think, I don't have to know all those cool insiders-excuses to be able to comment on this failure.

So please. Spare me your epigrams. They won't change anything about the facts.

[dang]

Hey, please don't take HN threads further into flamewar. Your reply here is a noticeable drop hellward, and that's what we're trying to avoid here!

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html