|
|
|
|
|
|
by brabel
1032 days ago
|
|
|
While I sympathize with your point, I found this passage funny: > code, that needs deep analysis to understand what it's trying to do Because if there's on thing AI can already do really well, it's explaining what some code is doing. |
|
|
But it just makes up a series of words which sound good. It's accidentally correct 75% of the time and just wrong the other 25%. (and IMO, just wrong in some way almost every time I use it).