|
|
|
|
|
by abathur
1025 days ago
|
|
Thought exercise: functionally speaking, how similar is ~compromising the quality of high-school sex education (i.e., getting rid of it, making it elective, giving parents any control or veto over the curriculum, converting it to an abstinence-only curriculum, ensuring it's taught by prudes, etc.) to rolling back access to birth control? (Edit: not really directed at parent poster. Just something you made me think of...) |
|
How about:
- 12 month parental leave for fathers and mothers
- 20 days minimum payed holiday
- paid sick leave
- Free childcare
- Insurance covered 15 days assistance at home post partum with a post-natal caregiver
- Child stipends up to the age of 18 years old
None of this is ground breaking in many developed countries.
So much work yet to do in implementing pro-child policies and yet your first step is entrapping teenagers into a pregnancy and a lifelong commitment?