|
|
|
|
|
|
by akasakahakada
1029 days ago
|
|
|
Paper is more focused on "feedback benefit learning" instead of how long should people wait for feedback. Seems that you are quoting another paper instead. But I don't think it is definitive, as you see, n=27. Also the experiment setting is not about how long after initial test, it is about how short before the next test. https://link.springer.com/article/10.3758/MC.37.8.1077 > The participants were 27 students enrolled in Grade 6 at The School at Columbia University in New York City. |
|
|