|
|
|
|
|
by citizenpaul
1027 days ago
|
|
>A pointy scabbard would foible the wearer in the leg and groin. Curving the scabbard solves that problem nicely. This is one of those comically out of touch armchair historian takes. Curved blades were made back then for the same reason they are still made. They are effective at killing other humans quickly. Aimed at a throat or other vulnerable point the blade is highly likely to drag across an artery on the withdrawal thereby quickly ending your confrontation. Curved blades don't work as well on animals with fur and thick hides. |
|
Having lived in the Middle East and owned a traditional curved dagger, I can safely say that the type of dagger mentioned in the original article is not used primarily for warfare. They serve as a symbol of manhood and social status. It is seen as highly disrespectful and dishonorable for a man to draw his dagger.
> Curved blades were made back then for the same reason they are still made.
Traditional Arab swords and blades intended for warefare are normally 2+ feet long. Not too sure that a 3" dagger is too effective.