|
|
|
|
|
by countWSS
1025 days ago
|
|
Modern education system destroys innovation at large,
and the economies of modern world don't support invention
at rate you'd expect to influence technology.
There is no stimulus/prestige to be an inventor, the focus is
either money or fame,
with prestige of science being severely diminished in favor
of pop culture "recognition"(viral/memetic).
Science itself shifted from lone genius
inventors towards teams working for Big Science/Corporate world,
without individual recognition and respect,
reducing motivation towards the minimum work required
to function inside a structured "science team" churning papers for more funding.
These teams do invent stuff, but only
because these teams get better equipment, funding and
social support. Only rich eccentrics can fund "garage science",
with rest trying "startup culture" to monetize inventions
which incentivizes business-centric approach to "get something
quick to market to get rich" - which attracts far different
people than lone inventors working "for science":
people today want to protect/patent/safeguard their
invention far more than they want for it to be famous
or recognized, fearing being left in the dust while megacorporations
steal their inventions and mass-produce cheapest
version of their design at economic advantage. |
|
There’s a healthy number of blogs, tweets, and repo comments and communities (HN even) helping people understand these technical areas, drastically reducing the barrier to entry.
There certainly is a lot of protectionism putting a damper on things in many areas, but you’re talking about mass-production, which isn’t necessarily required in all cases, especially when there’s so many alternatives equivalents available these days.