Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by psychphysic 1024 days ago
All this stuff sold to us as eco alternatives are horrendous.

They are harmful imo as they detract from the ideal and usually attainable solution of reducing consumption.

1 comments

Some of it is, but not all.

> usually attainable solution of reducing consumption.

Hell no.

I'm a real life example of this "unicorn" — someone so utterly uninterested in acquiring material things that I spent an average of €1131 per month on everything combined in the last six months. Rent, travel, food, new laptop… and I'm not even trying to be frugal, this is with a lot of eating out and organic groceries.

If everyone did what I did, not only would we still have wasteful straws (why were they in my mango lassis?), but also the economy would collapse immediately.

If everyone cuts back as far as I can when I last tried seriously, the economy breaks much harder.

Edit: Misread and assumed 1100 euros / 6 months. Have removed comment
I think you may have misread something; €1131 per month, of which €468 is rent and utilities (in Berlin, so still a good rate).

€7.6 euros per week for food is doable, I think, but last time I really tried to optimise that I was at university, in the UK, and it was 2003. (£0.50/day: Lidl instant noodles that they don't even sell any more, Quaker oats packs that aren't sold here, skimmed milk, dried fruit in the oats; I don't recommend reproducing this, it was a game to see how little I could spend without going hungry).

Apologies I did misread - removed original comment.
It happens to all of us, no worries :)