|
|
|
|
|
|
by thrw37272217
1035 days ago
|
|
|
> My eyes just glaze over when even the "high-level explanation" jumps into formal notation like this. This is simply not factual. I read your comment and then found the offending passage in page 2. As a matter of fact, it starts with definition of terms, plainly stating we have two encryption schemes, one deterministic, the other randomized. We then take a set of documents, and for each document we take its set of keywords and then encrypt them using the two schemes and this what each 'record' ("tuple") in the db looks like. Now when you want to search, you take the deterministic scheme and encrypt using that and send it over to the EDB ... It then goes on to discuss why this is not the most secure way ("it leaks too much information"). |
|
|