|
|
|
|
|
by scarface_74
1035 days ago
|
|
> Since the first release of the iPhone? I find that hard to believe since the release notes for iOS 6 specifically called out their fine-grained permissions improvements. There was clearly some wholesale bundling before that. There has never been a version of iOS that forced you to accept all permissions before you could download it. I'm not even sure that would be possible. The OS wouldn't know what permissions an app needed until the first time you called a function that needed the permission. Tightening down permissions is more along the lines of only allowing an app to have access to certain pictures instead of your entire library. |
|
I didn't say that. I said they had access without any sort of permission mechanism. The bundling I was referring to was both the fine-grained access, and permissions that weren't gated.
> The OS wouldn't know what permissions an app needed until the first time you called a function that needed the permission.
The app can advertise to the OS which capabilities it will use and then the OS can deny the app access to anything it hasn't requested or it has but the user has not allowed.
> Tightening down permissions is more along the lines of only allowing an app to have access to certain pictures instead of your entire library.
That is not what that permissions tightening was like: https://www.cultofmac.com/173128/new-ios-6-privacy-settings-...
> The iOS6 beta brings much finer-grained controls to the privacy settings, letting you specify just what services any app will have access to.
There weren't limitations on calendar, contact, reminder and photo gallery access.