[abwizz]

> This kind of strategy seems a bizarre one for a company. "Let's figure out how to systematically pay our employees less than they're really worth."

so we established that the revenue of the company belongs to the employees that worked for it, but the company has to skimm at least the operating costs before payout as otherwise it would make a loss.

but most companies have an obligation to make profit, so there is no other way than to pay the employees less than what they're worth (because increasing revenue would also increase the value of employees accordingly)

please tell me where i'm wrong

[RhodesianHunter]

In this world employee value would be set by the market for their skills, not how their output translates into revenue when pushed through the context of the business' products.

[pc86]

> so we established that the revenue of the company belongs to the employees that worked for it

Where did we establish this? Because it's not true, especially in a strictly legal sense.

[abwizz]

thx