|
|
|
|
|
by jakecopp
1024 days ago
|
|
> I have a Mastodon account, but I don't love it, for the same reasons I didn't like Twitter. In addition, I think that way of consuming content is generally like watching mainstream TV or listening to radio with ads. You're letting a bunch of people who aren't really that important to you, or qualified to do the job, be the content curators for you. Isn't that the opposite of Mastodon? The _default_ Mastodon home feed is only people you explicitly follow and posts they re-share (and it's easy to hide re-posts if desired). There is no suggested content. It's basically as close as social media can get to an RSS feed. |
|
- "It's not really possible to use Twitter without at least a little bit of doomscrolling"
- "I think that the core concept of a "tweet" is fundamentally unhealthy, because by design it promotes angry and extreme content."
- "Most users don't understand that by "dunking" on someone, they are actually promoting the content."
This is basically a critic of fast-paced short interaction based on an infinite timeline. The comment about TV afterwards may seem weird but for me it makes sense. The whole concept of having everything in a single bucket is very TV-like. I don't believe user behavior will be very different on mastodon than twitter: people will follow some very productive accounts and their feed will be dominated by these.