|
|
|
|
|
by uhhhhhhh
1026 days ago
|
|
Considering they engaged legal representation and it sounds like Apple rather than fight it restored their account. So we can probably safely assume it wasn't a glaringly obvious or serious breach of the terms that Apple felt it could defend. I don't imagine Apple would make cost benefit decisions about who can break their terms of service with nothing more than a letter with a legal letterhead. That being said we will know for sure as the plaintiff seems to be bound to make Apple foot the legal bill one way or another. Good for them. |
|
I hope they get a multiplier on their damages. $725,000 for 4 months of downtime for 7 people doesn't seem like enough.