[version_five]

I was asked to sign one once, I said no, and it turned out the startup had just got some standard contracts from someone and was using them because they had them, not because of some specific concern so they had no problem changing them to something mutually acceptable. Any company that won't do this is not worth working with.

[jimmy2020]

The original document initially mentioned the 'software industry' and I indicated that by signing it, I would be legally agreeing not to work in the software industry at all. They mentioned they would provide a more specific definition, but I still found it unusual. I understand signing an NDA, but a non-compete agreement feels more like giving them the right to sue me if they choose to.

[JohnFen]

> The original document initially mentioned the 'software industry' and I indicated that by signing it, I would be legally agreeing not to work in the software industry at all.

If that's the clause, then 100% don't sign it. I've never heard of a noncompete that locks you out of an entire industry before. More typically, a noncompete restricts you from working at companies that directly compete with the company hiring you.

Personally, that they'd even ask for something that extreme, even if it can be negotiated to be less onerous, would put me off of working for them. I'd take it as a sign that they're a bad company to work for.

[al2o3cr]

If they don't want you working in the software industry for 16 months, then there's a simple and straightforward solution: they should pay you. Look up "garden leave" for more about the practice.

[jimmy2020]

Excellent point. Thank you.