Y
Hacker News
new
|
ask
|
show
|
jobs
by
dragonwriter
1031 days ago
> tautological and by definition
That's redundant and repetitive.
1 comments
sudosysgen
1031 days ago
If you want to be incredibly pedantic, something can be tautological without being part of the definition, and something can be part of the definition without being tautological (by way of contradiction).
link