The main point is that it is a lot easier to trust something you can understand than some black-box machine certified by experts. Thus, eletronic voting systems are more vulnerable to trust attacks.
i agree that not understanding something make it easier to mistrust, but understanding does not ensure it will be trusted.. the same way not understanding something does not necessary mean people will not trust it..
paper ballots are easy to understand but it is know to have many vulnerabilities thus it suffer from trust attacks the same way..
On the other side, i think a good example is that most people do not understand 1% about how modern cars work yet many people trust then with their life daily..
I personally would not trust a 100% analog election with paper ballots and manual counting of the votes like old ages, but i do see the value on adding paper ballots on top of modern electronic voting system as another layer of audition.
You use the physical paper ballot that will be manually counted but digitally printed by the machine and thus could have an electronic signature to validate making it impossible to create fake votes. You could even have automated counting of those votes if you some qr code and only manually count the paper ballots in some cases.
all a person could do it trash some votes, but then the count between the paper ballots and the electronic consolidation would not match.
paper ballots are easy to understand but it is know to have many vulnerabilities thus it suffer from trust attacks the same way..
On the other side, i think a good example is that most people do not understand 1% about how modern cars work yet many people trust then with their life daily..
I personally would not trust a 100% analog election with paper ballots and manual counting of the votes like old ages, but i do see the value on adding paper ballots on top of modern electronic voting system as another layer of audition.
You use the physical paper ballot that will be manually counted but digitally printed by the machine and thus could have an electronic signature to validate making it impossible to create fake votes. You could even have automated counting of those votes if you some qr code and only manually count the paper ballots in some cases.
all a person could do it trash some votes, but then the count between the paper ballots and the electronic consolidation would not match.