[catlover76]

Except the article doesn't say "he is [in] league w Putin"--it does say he repeated talking points that are Russian talking points. Even Reid Hoffman, whose comments gave rise to the article in the first place, isn't really saying that; he seems to be saying that Musk is just mistaken, not that he is in active cahoots with Putin.

The article brings in a number of facts surrounding Musk's statements and involvement w/r/t Russia and Ukraine, such as the Star Link stuff you reference. Unless the article genuflects to him and pretends like none of the other facts it mentions exist, you think it's biased?

> Musk is one of the only individuals in the world that actively tries to solve real problems.

Even assuming this is true (though it is a daft and cultish claim), that doesn't mean that he is above criticism.

> And people hate him for it.

You seem to be confused or simply disingenuous (my bet is the latter); people hate him because he's an arrogant man-child who has done things like used his fame to repeatedly call some guy a pedo, and who actively supports a political party that recently launched an insurrection in an attempt to overturn an election, among other acts of malfeasance. Even if you agree with his politics such as his views on things like Covid-19 and what he considers to be "free speech", don't go around pretending like people hate him because he "actively tries to solve real problems".

[inemesitaffia]

The article either contains fabrications or proves earlier articles have fabrications

[catlover76]

What fabrications? Nobody in this thread defending him has identified anything the article has gotten wrong; you guys are basically just offended and triggered that it's reporting facts that don't look good for Musk.

[inemesitaffia]

There's details in earlier articles from CNN, the economist and the New York times that mean someone has to be lying.

They can't all be true because they contradict each other