Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by toasted-subs 1029 days ago
Seems kind of shady imo. I know businesses is businesses but that's seems a bit too mean for my tastes.
5 comments

Ethics of the use of generative AI in the first place aside, I'm pretty sure the illustrator was aware of what they were intending to do with their work (they even were interviewed about it in the behind the scenes video)
I view this in the same way I view the use of an actor's voice for ai generations. Even if the person knows what you're doing with their data, it still feels really scummy and unethical. The idea that we can sample someone else's labor and be able to own that and generate shit from it in perpetuity (probably without paying them) feels very alienating.
Like being employed to write some code which then is owned by someone else?
Most software jobs have equity compensation now.
Curious. What planet do you hail from?
This could have been all with consent and adjusted payments. AI does not just replace an artist, it can also speed up the work tremendously. It gives new possibilities using volume.
I'm not in illustration, but isn't it already common to hire someone to create a "style book" of what it should look like, and then have other illustrators follow that? eg, I recall animated shows working that way.

Doesn't seem so incredibly different from that.

The illustrator was aware their work was going to be used in that way.
Care to expand? I have no idea what you’re on about.